Is It Too Late? How to Repair a Broken Relationship With Your Friend or Family Member
with Dr. Joshua Coleman, PhD
It’s never too late to repair a broken relationship.
Dr. Joshua Coleman, psychologist and bestselling author, gives you the playbook to help you know when to reach out and when not to reach out, and what exactly to say and not say.
Whether you’re the person who’s cut off contact or you're the one wondering why someone you love did, this episode will give you the language, tools, and context to start moving toward understanding and healing.
Your task as a parent is to be steady and loving and compassionate and available and responsibility taking and hope that over time your child can find their way back to you.
Dr. Joshua Coleman, PhD
Featured Clips
Transcript
Mel Robbins (00:00:03):
At some point this is going to impact all of us. What am I talking about? I'm talking about estrangement. Somebody cuts you out of their life intentionally and it is on the rise. Since it's so misunderstood, I wanted to track down the world's leading expert on estrangement and he's here today. You and I are going to have a really important conversation about a topic that is profoundly misunderstood and it is on the rise. In fact, researchers call this a silent epidemic. What am I talking about? I'm talking about estrangement. Estrangement is when somebody cuts you out of their life intentionally, and it is on the rise. Whether you've experienced this in your friendships or in your family, or whether you have not, this is a topic that is profoundly misunderstood, and the research also shows that 50% of us will experience estrangement in our families.
(00:01:10):
In fact, in the last month, two fans of the Mel Robbin Podcast have bumped into me in real life, and when I asked them, what would you want me to do a podcast episode on? Both of them said, could you please do something about estrangement? The one lady hadn't talked to her sister in five years. The sister had just cut her out. The other one was a man who was heartbroken over the fact that he and his wife hadn't spoken to their daughter in seven years. In fact, they didn't even know where she lived.
Mel Robbins (00:01:42):
This is more common than you would think. And so I thought, I'm going to do something about this. This is not happening in my immediate family, and I hope it never does, but estrangement is present in my extended family, and I also have had an experience where my two closest friends, one of them stopped talking to the other one for three years and I didn't know what to do.
(00:02:06):
And so I thought, here's what we're going to do. Since this is on a rise, since it's so misunderstood, I wanted to track down the world's leading expert on estrangement, and he is here. He is a practicing psychologist in San Francisco who has written four books. His research on adult estrangement has also been published in academic journals, and he is here to help us understand this topic, why it happens, why is it on the rise, what are the mistakes and the situations that we are in that typically lead to estrangement, and more importantly, let's talk reconciliation. What are the mistakes that people make when they're desperate to reconcile with somebody? And what are the step by step things that you should do that are counterintuitive based on the research in order to make that reconciliation happen? If there was ever a podcast episode to listen to, I think it's this one, because I think the research is wrong. I personally believe that this is impacting way more than half of us. I think that
Mel Robbins (00:03:13):
At some point, this is going to impact all of us, and so consider this conversation today, a toolkit for you to use, for you to share, to help you understand this, to help you avoid it. God forbid, it does happen to empower you to take the steps to reconcile if that's what you want to do. Alright, Dr. Coleman, welcome to the Mel Robbins Podcast.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:03:38):
Thank you. Thanks for having me.
Mel Robbins (00:03:40):
Let's just start at the most basic level, and can you define for all of us what is estrangement?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:03:49):
I mean, people define it in different ways. That's part of the problem with the research that's been done. The way that I think of it is it's a cutoff in a relationship that may be temporary, may be permanent, but where it's not just people getting out of touch, it's where one person, because typically it's one person wants it and one person doesn't. More typically it's initiated by the adult child. My area of specialization is with parent, adult child estrangement, and the parent doesn't want it, the adult child does. So I think of it as a either complete cutoff or a near to complete cutoff.
Mel Robbins (00:04:25):
How common is estrangement?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:04:28):
Well, apparently it's very common and getting more common all the time. A recent study out of Ohio State, so that 26% of fathers are estranged from their kids. The same studies found 6% of mothers are, but other studies have found that closer to 10 to 11% of mothers are estranged from their kids. But if you expand it out away from just the parent adult child to family members in general than something like 27% of families in the US are estranged from a family member. So it's incredibly common. I think growing more common all the time.
Mel Robbins (00:05:01):
Why do you think it's growing more common?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:05:04):
I think it's a variety of reasons. I think our culture is becoming more identity focused, more tribalistic, where we have kind of ingroup outgroup ideas and that no longer includes family. I think the notion of family has radically changed where say prior to the 1960s or so, there was the idea of honor thy mother and my father respect thy elders families forever. And that's really been turned on its head where increasingly the idea is that of chosen family, the family who you make it, that people don't owe their parents anything that the most important things, the preservation of my happiness, my wellbeing, my mental health. So there's always been estrangements, but never before have they been based on the idea that it's actually good for one's mental health or it's even an act of existential courage to cut off a parent or a family member.
(00:06:01):
And it's tied to what the sociologist Anthony Giddens talks about is the evolution from role to self. Whereas it used to be there were very clear ideas prior to the 20th century, arguably before that, but where the ideas about what it takes to be a member of a family was fairly clearly defined, being a good parent, being a good child, et cetera, being a good adult child, and then it changed much more towards an orientation towards self. So what gins talks about is that we've had the evolution of what he calls the pure relationship, where relationships are now purely constituted on the basis of whether or not that relationship is aligned with that person's ideals, their goals or aspirations for happiness, et cetera. And if they're not, then the relationship is viewed as being problematic and corruptive and not worth pursuing.
Mel Robbins (00:06:53):
You see it all over social media. If you look at all of the, just put a post up and you're like, oh, if they had cut 'em off, toxic behavior. And what do you want us to know before we even jump into this topic of an intentional cutting off of a relationship with a family member or a friend? What do you want us to know about the reality of relationships, the dimensional reality? What is true about relationships that last and what relationships are meant to be about?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:07:29):
Yeah. No, it's a good question and there's probably no really easy answer to that. The way I think about it is both at the community level and at the individual level. I mean at the community level, I feel like we as a culture are really suffering. We have high rates of mental illness. We have high rates of depression in particular, loneliness, social isolation, increasing atomization, increasing tribal view. So we're really kind of coming apart at the seams. It really feels like we're living at a time when our culture is falling apart. So at the community level, I think that family is an important part of that aspect and that people should do whatever they can to prioritize family and family relationships. That said, I don't believe that people have to do it at any cost. There are family members who are very destructive or are very hurtful, who aren't willing to make amends to take responsibility.
(00:08:22):
I mean, most of the people that I work with are the parents, and my whole method is around that. You have to take responsibility for the things that have caused your child to turn away from you. And if you don't feel like you understand, then you have to pursue empathy and understanding and compassion. But from the adult child's perspective, I would like to see more compassion for parents that parents typically do the best that they could do, given what their own social economic temperamental resources were, their own childhood traumas, et cetera, and they deserve a certain period of time of being able to work on the relationship and to have a hearing and that kind of thing. That's kind of the general way that I would think about that.
Mel Robbins (00:09:06):
Dr. Coleman, I'm fascinated with how you got into the work of counseling and supporting parents who are estranged from adult children. Can you tell us a little bit about how you came to do this?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:09:21):
Sure. I mean, I was married and divorced in my twenties and how fully grown daughter who I'm very close to, but there was a period of time in her early twenties, which she cut off contact for several years. And Laura's response to my becoming remarried and having children in my second, which is my current marriage, I'm 30 plus years. And there are many ways that she felt displaced by that, hurt by not so much the divorce because she was so young, but just by all the kind of things that can happen with divorce and remarriage and about blended family and the like. And at the time there was nothing really written to advise me or help me. I was in therapy at the time trying to get help, and the advice I got was terrible as it often is.
Mel Robbins (00:10:03):
What was the advice that you were getting?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:10:05):
The advice was just kind of like you need to remind her of all the things that you've done for her and correct her memories and just show up at her place and kind of demand that she see you and all those things are none of them really caused her to feel understood or cared about or I had any degree of compassion for what her experience it was. So it really wasn't until I just learned how to stop explaining, defending, stop blaming and respect where she was coming from, that things began to turn. But during that time of estrangement, it was easily the most painful, awful, disorienting thing I've ever been through, wherever hoped to go through. Again, the idea that, I don't know if you have children, Amy, but the idea that your child would cut you off and you may never see them again is horrifying, painful, and terrifying as well.
(00:11:00):
So once we did have a reconciliation, I thought, well, so many people struggling with this. I wrote my first book on the topic in 2007 when parents hurt, and as a result of that, I got a wide following of parents here and in other countries who are dealing with this. On the basis of that, I developed a system of webinars that I still do a free q and a every other Monday. And as a result of that, I did a research study of 1600 estranged parents that's been published in numerous academic journals and wrote my most recent book, rules of Estrangement, why Adult Children Cut Ties and How to Heal the Conflict. As a result, I'm also now have developed a training program for therapists because there's a huge deed which hopefully will be live in the next week or two. People can visit my website if they were interested in training or learning more about that.
Mel Robbins (00:11:52):
So let's talk about that moment of estrangement. What typically drives, and I'll focus on adult children since that's your area of expertise, but I'm sure that all these themes apply to friendships where there's estrangement all kinds of relationships where there's estrangement. I agree. What are the factors that typically lead someone to say, that's it, I'm going to cut my parents or somebody else out of my life?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:12:23):
Yeah, there's a number of pathways. If you look at the surveys of adult children, what they typically will say is emotional abuse, physical abuse, neglect, differences in values. Those are the most common things reported by the adult child. But other pathways are divorce in my own, obviously my own personal experience, but also statistically in my own research study and in my own clinical practice, 70% of the parents have been through a divorce. So there's a number of ways that divorce can increase the risk. One is it may cause the child of any age to blame one parent over the other for the divorce, it can bring in new members, stepsiblings, half siblings, new stepmothers, stepfathers have to compete for emotional and material resources. It may cause the child to support one parent over the other even if the parents don't need to have that kind of support.
(00:13:22):
Finally, in a highly individualistic culture like ours, it could cause the child to see the parents more as individuals with their own strengths and weaknesses and not as a family unit that they're a part of. So divorce is a clear risk mental illness in the parent, but equally mental illness in the child, in the adult child, the role of therapy, bad therapists or therapists that just aren't very well educated in this, who assume that every, every problem that services an adulthood has a childhood trauma at the heart of it, which isn't necessarily true, but so many therapists believe that and put the adult child on the pathway to estrangement.
Mel Robbins (00:14:01):
Hold on a second. I just want to make sure everybody hears that. So you're saying that there are lots of therapists out there that take whatever their client is telling them and run with it and basically facilitate the linking of childhood issues with estrangement being something that they should consider?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:14:26):
Yeah, consider or do. I mean, I've had numerous parents show me letters from adult children where they said, well, my therapist said that you're a narcissist and you can't change, so I'm not willing to do family therapy with you. And these are often therapists who've never met the parent. They're diagnosing the parent from afar and more problematic. They're assuming childhood traumas that may or may not exist. I mean, childhood traumas are a real thing, but in this day and age, there's the assumption that if somebody has a problem in adulthood, well, you just have to figure out where the childhood trauma lies and then the doors to identity and happiness and meaning will be open. But that's really problematic. We're really preoccupied with traumas at this point in our culture and society in a way that's really causing a lot of harm.
Mel Robbins (00:15:14):
So I'm sure that as people are listening, there's a bazillion bells going off. And so I of course want to go, okay, well, let's talk about childhood trauma and all this stuff, but I want to stay in this topic because I personally believe that everybody listening has had either an experience with estrangement or they know somebody who is really struggling because of estrangement. And I can think even in my own family that when my uncle died, he had never met two of his grandchildren. And just how helpless I felt about trying to, wishing somehow that could have been repaired before he died. And knowing the heartache and the frustration and the anger and the sadness and the grief that happens when somebody makes a decision to cut you out of their life and you don't even really know why. And so is that for a baseline? How do you know if this is a situation of estrangement versus just busyness? And I don't really like that brother of mine, so I don't really call him very often, but he does get the Christmas card from us, actually. How do you know you're in the boundaries of somebody has deliberately cut you out?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:16:47):
Yeah, no, it's a good question. It's not, the answer isn't at all obvious. And I think that
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:16:52):
A lot of parents today end up getting more estranged because they're wanting more closeness from their adult child than the adult child feels capable or desiring of giving. And so often, and there was a survey done out of the University of Virginia that said that a majority of parents raising children want and expect to be best friends with their children once they're grown. And it's great, great work if you can get it, but a lot of adult children don't necessarily want that level of closeness or intimacy. And one of the problems with social media, which can be another pathway to estrangement, is that it allows a certain kind of intrusion of the parent on the adult child that they might not want. So I think a certain percentage of estrangements occurred that wouldn't have occurred in the past because the adult child could just sort of organically become who they are, develop independently, develop their own voice and autonomy without parental influence, whereas now parents can reach their child, their adult child, anywhere in the world within a matter of seconds.
(00:17:58):
And so I think a certain percentage of adult children feel very crowded today. What's the most common complaint I hear in every single strange adult child's letter is you need to respect my boundaries. So boundaries have become the most important thing. And it's in part because parents raising children over the past four decades are more worried. They're more worried about getting their children through the narrow bottleneck of they can land them in a successful life. They're worried about the world if their children aren't happening. So parents have become more anxious, more guilt ridden, more intrusive, more surveilling, and that doesn't always work in the parent, adult child relationship in the long term. So to circle back to your question, it may not start out as an estr and it may start out more as kind of normal distance,
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:18:46):
But as soon as the parent starts to act to victimized or hurt or criticizing the adult child, then they're putting themselves on the path to a potential estrangement.
Mel Robbins (00:18:56):
I can personally say there was a period in my relationship with my mom who I love deeply and I know she loves me. And as I look through the family history, both on my mom and dad's side, they have I guess somewhat kind of complex arms length relationships with their family love, but not hanging out all the time. And part of it is physical distance. And there was a period of time where I was newly married and I was so enthusiastic about my husband and about his family, and we were living closer to my husband and my husband's family. My parents are in the Midwest, they're on the east coast, and I know it was an extraordinarily painful period for my mom because she from a distance felt like she was losing me to another family.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:19:52):
Yeah, it's very common.
Mel Robbins (00:19:54):
And I started to sense that resentment or that fear and that started to upset me. And so we got into a period of time where we didn't know how to come together, how she would say something, I would get offended, I would say something, she would get offended, and it felt like our relationship had all of these landmines that neither one of us wanted there.
(00:20:25):
I just wanted to get back to that. I just love you and you just love me. And I could see that without me doing a tremendous amount of great therapy and without us even having almost like a period where we tolerated each other, that it could have to a disastrous and hurtful situation for both of us, both very opinionated, we have big emotions, we're very similar, and we didn't know how to navigate this without hurting or upsetting the other person. And so I think at least when I am so grateful, it didn't end up differently. I feel closer to her now than I ever have, but I can see how it's almost like when people separate before divorce, I always kind of roll my eyes and I'm like, what's the point here? I can see how just going, I'm not going to call them. I'm not going to pick up the phone. I'm not going to go visit. I'm not going to do this. That sort of deescalation can lead to something like this.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:21:38):
Yeah.
Mel Robbins (00:21:40):
Is that what you've seen?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:21:42):
Yeah. You're saying that the deescalation can actually help? It can provide,
Mel Robbins (00:21:46):
I think it can help on some hands, but I could see how not talking to somebody for a month or two months or a couple months and just kind of being that sort of cold, uninterested, distant, I could see how that would actually throw gasoline on the fire because the emotions actually build, and then every interaction is so high stakes. It's a recipe for disaster.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:22:20):
Yeah, no, I think you're putting your finger on a couple of important things. When I was talking about the pathways too estranged, but I didn't was one of the most common pathways, and that's when the child marries, the adult child marries. And if there's conflict between the son-in-law or daughter-in-law and the parents, sometimes the son-in-law or daughter-in-law basically says to their spouse, choose me or them. You can't have both. And men in particular are vulnerable to that, but you're also putting your finger on the fact that the parents can commonly feel like, well, how can the other parents get to spend more time with you or the grandkids? And in some ways, sons are more at risk. The parents of sons are more at risk of that because of what sociologists refer to as the matrilineal advantage, which means statistically daughters are more likely to kind of prioritize their own family over sons, et cetera. But that is a really common source of estrangement or beginning conflict. And to your point that once conflict starts, it can quickly spiral out of control and lead to an estrangement. And for parents, I think most parents feel kind of panicky when the adult child starts to pull back and be more distant, become less available. And that causes what John Gottman refers to as the pursuer distance dynamic where the person,
Mel Robbins (00:23:42):
What is it called?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:23:44):
He talks about from a marital research perspective, the pursuer distancer dynamic, and it's associated with the high risk of divorce where one partner more typically the wife is pursuing the other for more contact, more intimacy, more communication. The other person more typically the husband pulls back more, becomes is more shut down. And over time, that dynamic is more rigidified and harder to change until the couple splits up with a similar thing I observed with parents and adult children around estrangement, the parents starts to pursue more and more and more, you're calling me blah, blah, blah, and then they're off to the races.
Mel Robbins (00:24:22):
One of the reasons why I was so excited to talk to you is because you're my favorite kind of expert. You not only have all the credentials, but you have the lived experience. What are the big mistakes that you see people who want to reconcile with somebody who's cut them off? What are the big mistakes that people make or that you made?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:24:45):
Yeah, I have a whole webinar on this call, the five most common Mistakes of estranged parents, and I'm sure I made all of them. The first one is thinking that it should be fair. As soon as you think it should be fair, then you're going to, first of all, you're going to feel more victimized by your child, which is not a good place to be, both as a person, but also in terms of how you communicate. It's going to make you feel more angry and resentful, and that's going to come out. The idea that it should be fair as the idea of like, well, I was a much better parent than my own was think of all the sacrifices I made. I was there for this kid in so many ways. But from the parent's perspective, it isn't fair. It's much more about practically what works and what doesn't work.
(00:25:28):
And that relates to the second common mistake, and that is using guilt thinking that you're going to motivate your child through guilt. I'm currently writing an article called The Last Jewish Mother because I'm Jewish, and it was sort of a trope in the culture about the Jewish mothers can kind of guilt trip their kids into contact The joke, how do you get a Jewish mother to change the light bulb? Don't worry, I'll just sit here in the dark. So the idea, it's sort of an affectionate trope that the mothers could use guilt to motivate their children, but I call it the last Jewish mother because parents can no longer do that. Guilt is now considered a toxic, coercive, corrupt the book a force. It's pathetic to the idea that the adult child doesn't owe the parent anything and shouldn't feel guilt. So using guilt is not going to work, including statements like how miserable the adult child's making the parent feel through the estrangement.
(00:26:27):
Third common mistake, and I see therapists enabling this mistake, is returning fire with fire. If the adult child says something angry or assertive or critical, that the parent fires right back at them and tells them they're ungrateful and challenges them and says, you can't talk to me that way. You need to respect me. And it may be true that they want respect, but returning fire with fire never works. The fourth is assuming that it's all about the parent, which goes to what you and I were talking about before. There may be not as much contact because the adult child's more preoccupied with their own life, their own children, their own career, their own social lives. What I tell parents is, look, when we have adult children and grandchildren, they're front and center of our minds, our heart, our consciousness. But for our adult children, that's not the same.
(00:27:21):
We're not at the front of their hearts and minds and consciousness. And I know that was true with my own parents as well when they were alive, and I was very close to them, to my parents. So I just knew that when I called my parents or visited to them, that, I mean, I liked both, but I knew it meant much more to them than it did to me. Similarly, if my adult children call me or visit me, I know it means more to me than it does to them. So the mistake is sort of not knowing, assuming that every bit of distance or non-responsiveness or not returning that text right away or that email or whatever is personal because once you make it personal, then you are on the pathway to estr room. The final mistake is not knowing is failing to recognize how long Es strange would takes to reconcile, but it's a marathon, it's not a sprint.
(00:28:09):
And then even if you're taking the best next steps that it still may be a matter of months or even years before you can get your child to respond. So those are the most common mistakes that I see. Well, let me add one more, and that is one of the key parts of my strategy with parents is helping them write an amen's letter where they take responsibility, where they're not defensive, they don't explain, they find the kernel, if not the bush of truth in their children's complaints. And the common mistake I see with letters is that they say, well, if I did anything wrong or I'm sorry you feel that way, or those kinds of things which aren't really taking responsibility and not really facing the hard cold truth about the mistakes that they made. Because as parents, we all make them, but it's a hard thing to do. I mean, I didn't love doing it myself when I did it, but it is the most effective way to potentially bridge a distance between a parent and an adult child.
Mel Robbins (00:29:08):
What I would love to do is go mistake by mistake and unpack it a little bit more so that we can understand how that mistake that we make when we're trying to make amends or trying to make contact with somebody who has cut us off, how it backfires and what it feels like for the person that has cut you off. I think that would be helpful. The first one was, it was to think that things should be fair. So why is that a mistake, and if you think things should be fair, what do parents do that backfires?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:29:45):
Yeah. Well, one of the things that I teach parents, particularly who've been in a longer term estrangement, is the principle of radical acceptance.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:29:53):
And part of radical acceptance is that saying that it is what it is. I can take all the best steps, but I may not be able to do any better. And when we think that things should be fair, we're really injecting a certain amount of resentment and bitterness and unhappiness into the equation. So it just isn't very helpful to one's mental health, regardless of reconciliation, to sort of say, well, this isn't fair. I shouldn't be treated like this. I was such a good parent. I was a better parent than my own parents were. They're not acknowledging all the good things that I did. They're rewriting history. I mean, all those things may be true, but tormenting yourself with that kind of feeling, it's just going to make you miserable, but it's also going to make you more resentful to your adult child from your child's perspective. It's completely fair. They wouldn't be doing it unless they thought it was fair. So one of the things I tell parents to do when they write in a men's letter is to start by saying, I know you wouldn't do this unless they felt like it was the healthiest thing for you to do,
(00:30:53):
Because that's how it feels to the adult child, and the parent has to get on the same page as the adult child. If this parent comes across as being defensive or blaming or not willing to take responsibility, game over, the adult child's going to go, well screw you that I'm not going to have a relationship
Mel Robbins (00:31:07):
With you. This is why I did it in the first place.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:31:09):
Exactly. That's right. That's right.
Mel Robbins (00:31:12):
And I think resentment is the powerful word there because in this feeling that things should be fair, what you're not saying is I resent the fact that I gave you fucking everything and this is what you're doing to me.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:31:30):
Right, exactly.
Mel Robbins (00:31:31):
And I see this even in myself. We were just yesterday after school quickly trying to find a black suit for my son for prom this weekend, and we went to three different places. Thankfully we found something and I turned to him and I said, Hey, can you give me a lift home
(00:31:55):
Before practice? And he said, oh, mom, it's going to make me late for practice. And I caught the words before they came after my mouth out of my mouth. But what I almost said to him, Dr. Coleman, was, are you fucking kidding me? I just spent an hour and a half with you and spent hundreds of dollars on a suit to support you. You can't drive me 10 measly minutes home. And then I thought for a second, not because I was talking to you today, but I was like, how is shaming or being resentful or that is a example of how I think I'm trying not to be transactional. I'll love you in if I buy you shit, you need to do something for me, but it's hard. And so I can see how that opinion that I'm doing this for you. So it has to be fair on my terms, on my terms because I could step into his shoes, which is what you basically ask your clients to do to get from the one side of the table to putting your arm around your child and trying to see it from their point of view.
(00:33:06):
I basically took him shopping. That was the window that was convenient for me. And so from his side, he was also accommodating me and he didn't want to be late, which I can understand based on values. So I love that because I think the resentment piece is what somebody who cuts you off picks up on or this transactional thing, talk about guilt for a minute. So is guilt part isn't guilt kind of similar to the It should be fair, so you should be doing that. It's kind of part of this whole thing.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:33:42):
It is. And it just doesn't work anymore. It works. There's plenty of cultures where it still works. There's plenty of cultures where the notion of feel obligation duty to one's parents, et cetera, still very active, particularly in Confucian and other Asian cultures and in Latin American cultures is the notion of fism. So there's the bond of the family that's considered a very important value. So in those kinds of cultures, there's more of a place for a parent to kind of come at it from a perspective of, look, I'm your mother or I'm your father. This is what kids should do. And it is more tolerated and accepted because the adult child has embrace those values. But in the rest of American culture, north American culture, there's the idea that adult children don't owe their parents anything. And that guilt is a excessive coercive corruptive demand. And so if the parent makes the child feel bad, then somehow they're now putting themselves in the role of being a toxic narcissistic person who the adult child should cut off in order to preserve their own mental health.
Mel Robbins (00:34:53):
So let's put everybody kind of in a therapy session with a family. You're with parents or a parent who has been estranged from a child or another family member. Where do you start with them?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:35:09):
Well, one of the things I tell parents, because most typically it's the parent who wants the therapy and the adult child is being kind of coaxed into it. Either I'm reaching out to them to see if they'll do it, I'm helping the parent reach out to them in a way that will make it more likely that the adult child would consider doing the family therapy. But what I explained to both parent and adult child, particularly parents, is that reconciliation therapy is not marital therapy. In marital therapy, you both equally come in with equal what the marriage can look like, negotiate you, compromise, you meet somewhere in the middle. Reconciliation therapy with an adult child is much more on the adult child's terms because they've already shown that they're willing to walk and that from their perspective, they're not in the same kind of pain that the parent is.
(00:35:54):
Now, they may have been in pain that caused them to cut off the parent, particularly if it was an abusive parent, et cetera. And there were childhood traumas and childhood traumas do exist. I'm not at all saying that they're a myth. I'm saying that we overstate them, but there's certainly plenty of kids who have had real childhood traumas. And so they feel a certain sense of endangerment in getting into the room with the parent to consider reconciliation because they feel like estrangement is a way to protect themselves and their mental health. So I make it clear to them as well that I have your back, that this is really about helping your parent learn how to become more empathic, to become more respectful of your boundaries, to learn more, to take more responsibility for the ways that they were hurtful to you, and to have a deeper understanding of why you felt like an estrangement was in your best interest.
(00:36:44):
And I told a parent that as well, because I don't want them to get into the therapy session and then feel kind of broadsided by me. I always say to them, if I side with anybody in the session, it's going to be with your adult child because first of all, it's the only way to keep them in the room. But second of all, it's just how I think about these dynamics. I think that even parents who did the best they could could still be really hurtful. And even if it's something that might not have felt hurtful to some other family member, if it felt hurtful to that adult child, it's still incumbent on us as parents to take the lead, to take the high road to show leadership and to make the moves in the right direction towards healing. So my experience is that if we can get past that initial phase of therapy where the parent can do a good job in empathizing and taking responsibility and accepting the child's terms, then we can kind of proceed to a new phase where the parent can talk more about what a good relationship would feel like to them.
(00:37:41):
And the adult child at that point is more willing to consider that than necessarily guaranteed to consider it. But they're in a much better place if they know that there are other boundaries and limits could be accepted and adopted.
Mel Robbins (00:37:53):
Can you, and have you achieved reconciliation with people when the person that cut them out of their lives won't come to reconciliation therapy?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:38:05):
Sure. I mean, sometimes it's just as simple as a really good amen's letter. I mean, a really good amen's letter can work miracles. That said, they don't always work. There's really nothing I can tell every parent that, gee, if you only just do Coleman's five steps towards reconciliation because some adult children, they're just not ready. They're too mad or hurt. They're too influenced by the other parent after a divorce. They're too influenced by their therapist, by who they're married to.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:38:32):
They may have a need to feel separate from the parent because they felt too close to them and do it out of a way to feel separate from the parent than to stay estranged. So these strategies don't always work, but they often work. And when they do work, it's because the parent's doing the right thing.
Mel Robbins (00:38:51):
Let's talk about the amends letter and the five steps to reconciliation. And again, whether it's an adult child or it's a sibling or it is a friend or your parent is the one that peaced out and you don't know why, I can't tell you. I have sat in the last month next to people on planes who have disclosed to me, one man in particular said, I'm a fan of your podcast. Could you please do something about estrangement? In his case, it was a daughter with mental health issues who they have not talked to in seven years.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:39:29):
Common.
Mel Robbins (00:39:30):
But that's something that I keep thinking about, which is I know a lot of people that are dealing with this, and so I wanted to do an episode because this is way more common than I think the studies even indicate.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:39:46):
I totally agree with you,
Mel Robbins (00:39:47):
And there is a tremendous amount of content. I agree with you, coaching people to cut people out, to have boundaries, which are important. We may differ a little bit in terms of the influence of childhood trauma on adult behavior. I think our difference probably has more to do with how much people lean on it versus taking responsibility for healing it. But when you get to that point where you feel like, I don't have the ability to have this person in my life, it's easier to just stop having a relationship with them. What are the five steps for somebody who's on the receiving end of that? We don't talk about that a lot. We don't talk a lot about, look, your parents did the best they could. If you look at the way your parents were treated growing up, it explains a lot about what they did doesn't justify it, Dr. Coleman.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:40:48):
No, I agree,
Mel Robbins (00:40:49):
But it certainly explains it. But what are the five steps to reconciliation?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:40:54):
Yeah. Well, it kind of depends on who the person is, who's seeking the help. I increasingly am having more adult children contact me who the parents cut them off, really, they're the ones who want help. Or even if the parents haven't cut them off, they just want an improved relationship. But I'm happy that my book speaks to the adult child as well, because it was written for the parent. It typically requires leader. I mean, if the adult child contacts me, then I'll reach out to the parent, but I'll also explain to them my method in the same way that if they were the ones who had reached out to me, and I'll say that this is the way that I work. So you need to know that before you sign on to doing any sessions with me, if you imagine that my goal is going to just be to side with you about how terrible your kid is, it's not going to happen.
(00:41:44):
So I'm very clear about that as a kind of a framework. Siblings are more complicated because for parents, it's very easy for me to get a parent to take the high road to take responsibility in so much pain. And there's this kind of a role violation of if a child cuts off a parent, there's a feeling like, well, it is my obligation to heal this. And I clearly, even if they feel like they're innocent, they can feel a great enormous sense of shame that their child feels like they've failed. So there are parents who won't do what I tell them to do. I can't help them if they won't. I tell parents, this isn't about right or wrong per se. It's about, it's kind of about the practicality. I mean, I do think that there is a moral basis to what I preach. The parents should take the high road that their children didn't choose to have them, and therefore it is incumbent on parents to take the high road and take responsibility and not get pulled into the weeds and not return fire with fire.
(00:42:41):
But there's not a third option. Parents sometimes want me to help them see how unfair their kid is being or that kind of thing. That just doesn't work. But anyway, with siblings, it's more tricky because parents are willing to walk over hot colds, which is sometimes required, but siblings typically aren't. So somebody has to take the high route. Somebody has to be willing to not get pulled into the weeds to make amends. You'd probably take more responsibility than they think is fair. I mean, if both siblings are equally motivated to heal the relationship and I have worked with those kinds of siblings, that's easier. Then it's more like marriage therapy, then you can examine the dynamics that shape them both and get them learn how to communicate more and kind of make the unconscious processes much more conscious. But more typically, one sibling is completely estranged and the other sibling is in pain about the estrangement. So typically the person who's in the most pain has to show more leadership. So that's the tricky part.
Mel Robbins (00:43:39):
I love what you said. Before we jump into the five steps, I just want to take a highlighter and make sure that everybody heard something that you said. You said that your personal belief is that the parents have a moral obligation to take the higher road because they chose to bring their children into the world.
Mel Robbins (00:44:04):
And I think that's an interesting thing to think about because you're right, there has been this rise of individualism, and i'm responsible for my happiness, and I don't even know where I was going with it, but I just felt like that's a very profound thing. And I think a lot of times when you get really wrapped up in feeling like things should be fair or your kids owe you something, we forget as parents that we're the ones that brought them into the world. They didn't choose us. We chose and created them.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:44:43):
Exactly. And
Mel Robbins (00:44:45):
That doesn't mean they owe us anything. If anything, it means we owe them something.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:44:50):
Yeah. I mean, I would argue, I would say two things of that. One is that I extend that even to wills. Like a lot of the parents in my practice have been treated miserably by their adult children. And it wouldn't surprise me. I'm sympathetic to some of these parents who want to cut their kids out of their will, but I say I, I don't support parents doing that.
Mel Robbins (00:45:09):
Why? It seems like my natural reflection is, of course, if you're going to cut me out of your life, why the fuck would I give you any money? Because I've been paying for your ass your whole adult life. Why would I continue to do that if you don't even, do you see how quickly I could go into that? I'm an angry, resentful parent.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:45:29):
Sure, yeah. No,
Mel Robbins (00:45:31):
Why would you say that? Why should somebody who's had a kid cut them out, actually give them money?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:45:37):
Yeah, no, I totally understand. And I'm sympathetic to any parent. The reason is that we're parents forever, and we're parenting long after we're gone. I mean, my parents are both dead and they still continue. Their influence still persists with me some good ways and some bad ways. But I don't think our responsibility as parents ends when we die. And as much as I hate the way some of these adult children treat their parents, how contemptuous, how rejecting they are, how much they've eviscerated the life of the parent, I still think that the role a parent continues after the parent dies. And it's also an issue, a question of what do you want your legacy to be? Do you want your legacy to be that you punished your child from the grave? And that doesn't mean parents have to give their child every single penny, but that they might give them what they would give them if they were still alive, A and B, if there's other siblings, it greatly complicates a sibling relationship if one of the children is cut out of the will.
(00:46:38):
Yes, I do think there's a moral obligation to parents. I think there also is a moral obligation to it from adult children that we've lost sight of in this culture. I actually do think that adult children owe the parents something. I just don't think that parents can demand that or extract it or guilt trip the child into doing it. But I think as a culture, some of these children who are estranging, their parents have been given a quality of life that their parents would've dreamed of. So the idea that the children just gets to say, well, you didn't go. I mean, some of the reasons that adult children cut off contact aren't because the parent was abusive or neglectful is because their therapist has convinced them that the parent was more responsible for how their lives turned out than they were. Or the kid got married to somebody who hates the parent, and the kid isn't strong enough to stand up to their spouse and say, no, they're my parents.
(00:47:30):
I want them to see them, and I want them to see their grandchildren regardless. So I think that in the same way that parents have a moral obligation, I think adult children do too. Now, that doesn't mean that they're obligated to stay in contact no matter how abusive or hurtful or critical or shaming, rejecting the parent is, but they are morally obligated to give the parent a time of due diligence to repair, to do therapy, to hear them out, to think of the parent in a more three-dimensional way, to view it from the perspective that you were saying earlier, that they did the best they could, not in a way that they're just get to be forgiven no matter how crappy their parenting was, but a perspective of compassion rather than contempt. So I think both sides, there's moral obligations.
Mel Robbins (00:48:15):
That's beautiful. It's really beautiful. I know in my own life, and I mentioned about my uncle never meeting his two grandkids, it was heartbreaking that they were at the memorial service. And I think you probably see that a lot that people show up in death because there is something deeper that connects us all. And I think that that's what that speaks to. And we have this inability as emotional beings to navigate what feels like endless landmines that can develop between us. And so what are the five steps that people can take in any situation, in any relationship where there has been an estrangement and you're the one, whether it's you want to take the higher ground or you're the one that's hurting more, what are the steps, doctor?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:49:15):
Yeah. Well, what I often tell parents is there's a lot more things you can do wrong then you can do, right? So the things you can do wrong are contained in the five most common mistakes that we've already discussed. The things that you can do are to show compassion, to take responsibility, to find the kernel, if not the bushel of truth in a child's complaints, to communicate that you know that they wouldn't cut off contact unless they felt like it was the healthiest thing for them to do. If you have no idea what the reasons are, and some parents don't, to say that it's clear I have significant blind spots as a parent or as a person that I don't have a deeper understanding, but I want to, would you feel comfortable writing me and telling me more about what your thoughts or feelings are that make you feel like this is the healthiest thing for you to do?
(00:50:04):
I promise to listen or read purely from the perspective of learning and not any way to defend myself on the one hand, to not give up. But at some point you might have to stop as a show of respect. So for example, if you're getting your letters returned to unopened, returned to sender, threats of the police called on you, communicating through an attorney or your kid just gets so unraveled and you should just stop completely for a year. Sometimes stopping completely works because the adult child can feel like the parent is respecting their boundaries. Finally, it can make them respect the parent more if they're not just continuing to try. No matter what that old saying, how can I miss you if you don't go away? Sometimes true in family life, it can create that sort of space for the adult child to come into.
(00:50:52):
So there's a lot of reasons why sometimes just stopping completely is the right thing. But a lot of it, and this is particularly to a parents who've been victims of parental alienation, where they've been brainwashed against the parent by the other parent after a divorce, is to embody what I call kind of the lighthouse model, that you're just there on the beach, you're steady, you're broadcasting light from its definite point on the beach while your child is being pushed up and down out at sea by the waves. And sometimes they'll come out and see you standing on the beach there broadcasting light, and they'll get oriented towards you, but then they'll be carried back out to sea and pushed underwater again. But your task as a parent is to be steady and loving and compassionate and available and responsibility taking and hope that over time your child can find their way back to you through those efforts.
Mel Robbins (00:51:42):
Can you define or can you describe what an amends letter is and how you write one?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:51:48):
Sure. First of all, they're much shorter than the parents often think they should be. Typically two paragraphs. As much as I recommend, you don't want it to be so long that so much rope that you're going to hang yourself with it. They should be courageous In aa, they talk about making a fearless and searching moral inventory of your character flaws. I think the same is true of an amen's letter to if your child has made complaints about you, to be able to really fearlessly say what those were and how you can see how that could have impacted your child, how that might've been hurtful or traumatizing to them, or damaging to them or affected their feelings of trust or safety or security in you or the relationship with you. That's critically important to not blame anybody else, to not make excuses, to not say, well, I was a single mother.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:52:42):
Well, your dad didn't pay any child support. Or Will your mother blame me for divorce when it wasn't my fault? Or you had a DD or learning disabilities, or you had your own issues or No, no, and no. It's a hundred percent about empathy, responsibility, taking that there has to be blood on the tracks, meaning that the parent has to actually do show courage in facing their own character flaws. Not in a self-hating way, but just in a way, and that's critically important as well. Shouldn't be an exercise in masochism, even though it is a painful thing to do. I understand from my own personal experience, they're not fun letters to write. They're actually super hard.
Mel Robbins (00:53:20):
What was it like for you to write one to your daughter when she cut you off?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:53:24):
Well, I mean, two things that go into it. One is this going to work, and the other is just having to face the reality of some of her complaints. I mean, I can empathize with the ways that she felt sort of sidelined when I remarried and other children and how my children from my second, my current marriage, had a much better quality of life and were raised in the context of a stable marriage. And she didn't have that. And she kind of went back and forth between two homes. There was conflict with me and her mother, and there was a lot there to be hurt and upset and feel displaced about. So it was very painful. There've been numerous times where we've cried together about it because it was, yeah, just really painful.
Mel Robbins (00:54:07):
What was her response to your letter?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:54:10):
Good. I mean, to her credit, what I tell parents is I was just lucky that my daughter had whatever it is that causes an adult child to forgive and to accept. Not all parents, their parents who are just as dedicated or empathic as me or communicate just as well or better than I did, who's the adult child or isn't willing or able to do that. But I was lucky that she was able to, it didn't happen right away, and it often doesn't, why I say it's often a marathon, not a sprint. So took a while and actually we had a number of conversations. It wasn't just one simple thing like, oh, great clouds departed all this forgiven. No, it still comes up periodically. I mean, not a lot, but those kind of things are fault lines in a parent, adult child relationship that probably exist in some form will always be there in one form or another.
Mel Robbins (00:55:05):
What if you're the one that's in the middle? So I've been in a situation where my two closest friends, one cut the other one off and didn't talk to her for three years, and I was in a relationship with both of them, and one kept trying to reconcile an absolute stonewall from the other. What do you do if you're the sibling or the other child, or you're kind of the friend in the middle?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:55:41):
Yeah. Well, it's often that a sibling will be one child is estranged and the other sibling is not estranged from the parents. And what I tell parents is you can't really have your non estranged child advocate for you. First of all, if one of your children is estranged from you, they're showing that they're capable of using estranged, but so they may well estranged that sibling. Second of all, the sibling may say that if you are acting like our parents advocate, I will cut you off. Or if you tell them anything that I'm telling you. So often the strange sibling makes the other, the not estr sibling swear that they won't reveal what their reasons are, what thinking or feeling, sometimes even where they live. So I tell parents that they have to accept that boundary and limit as difficult as it is. The other thing I tell parents is that if you have one kid as estranged, you don't want the non estranged kids to feel like they have to sort of hold up some mirror of you as the great parent.
(00:56:43):
They know how much pain you're in, so you're better off saying to them something like, look, your sister, your brother's estranged. Either we don't understand it or we do understand it, but I don't want you to feel like you have to sort of repair my self-esteem by making me feel like I'm a great parent or whatever. You may have the same complaints about me, or you may have different complaints, but I want you to feel like that there's room to do that without worrying about being overly burdensome to me. Now, if you're the friend, it's sort of a similar dynamic where you don't really have that kind of power to really change very much about it, and you don't really, really won't serve your friendship to be overly allied one against the other, even if you think that one person's more at fault or more troubled or more difficult. And we've all got probably, most of us have at least one difficult friend. So we could be sympathetic to the other friend who's on the receiving end of that. But if you put yourself in a position of advocacy, it's not typically wanted. And so that can cause the person who's being advocated against to feel more misunderstood or ganged up on or that kind of thing.
Mel Robbins (00:57:55):
I think if there's one thing I'm taking away from this incredible conversation is that when this happens, there's typically on the part of the person that is estranged this story or feeling that you just don't get it.
(00:58:12):
And I'm tired of trying to explain it and I'm tired of you defending yourself, and it's just easier and better for me to remove this from my life right now. And that's why everything that you're counseling us, which is the opposite of how you're going to feel when you feel wrong or hurt or desperate to reconnect with somebody, that really you have to step into the shoes of the other person or at least give them the experience that you have. As much as it may seem unfair or it may seem like, or it may seem just, I dunno, I am sitting here, I can't even put myself in the shoes of somebody who's experiencing this even though there's estrangement on both sides of my family in extended family, and even though my two best friends didn't talk for three years. And even though I see examples of this everywhere, and I, it must be a profoundly painful and challenging and humbling thing to do to say, this is so important to me that I'm going to be the leader in this process. And the only way that we're going to make progress is if the person that's cut me out actually feels like they've been validated and understood without me defending myself.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (00:59:49):
Yeah. No, I think that's really well said. I guess a really good summary of what this looks like and feels, one of the challenges is that generations are often talking past each other. So important article by Nick Haslum, who's an Australian psychologist and he called it concept creep. And what he found was that over the past three decades, while his article came out in 2015, so it's more than that at this point, but there's been an expansion of what we consider to be hurtful, traumatic, abusive, neglectful behavior. So often the adult child's saying is, you neglected me. You were emotionally abusive, you traumatized me. And the parents are like, what? Because they're looking at it from the way those terms were defined when they were
Mel Robbins (01:00:36):
Growing
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:00:37):
Up, whereas the adult child was looking at it in a very different way. So often if the adult child's saying, you emotionally abused me, the parents particularly, a lot of these parents who've given their children a really good quality of life just can't relate to it. And so what I tell parents to say is, I wasn't aware that you, it's clear that I have blind spots that I wasn't aware that that felt emotionally abusive to you. I'm glad you let me know. I would like to learn more about what that felt like to you, how that's impacted you. Is there something you'd like me to read? Would you like to get into therapy around it? Are there things you'd like me to work on in my own therapy? So again, it's to the point that you were making, the parent has to really go toward the adult child's complaints rather than away from them. They do have to show a certain amount of courage and willingness to kind of get into the really painful territory of how the child feels like they neglected them or hurt them or let them down. And no parent really particularly wants to go there.
Mel Robbins (01:01:33):
Definitely
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:01:33):
Not. It's not a fun place to be.
Mel Robbins (01:01:36):
So when you get to the point where it's like, okay, I have gotten the message. You don't want to talk. I'm going to just go silent for a year. Do you send somebody flowers on their birthday? How do you engage with somebody who doesn't want to engage with you?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:01:54):
Yeah. Well, there's a difference between a kid who's a minor, which I would say that parents shouldn't give up versus a kid who's more full fledged adult.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:02:05):
So no, I think if somebody, somebody's going to let the line go cold per my recommendations, I recommend they don't do anything because I think that for some adult children, they really need to feel that parent's, for some estrangements, they're really trying to get in touch with a certain part of themselves that they don't feel like they can access with the parent involved in their life. The parent in some ways is too important in their mind, the parent feels really unimportant, but it's in part because the adult child is sort of closed off contact in every avenue of access to that parent. So it's that feeling that the parent feels cut off because they haven't cut off, but the old child is doing it because they feel like the parent's too important in their mind. So if the parent can do that, can be no contact in the same way that the adult child is requesting that it allows the adult child to feel themselves in a different way in relationships with the parent. So it's what I call lose your parent, find yourself.
Mel Robbins (01:03:04):
Wow, let's leave on a hopeful note because even you talk about this topic. And I literally panic and I'm like, oh my God, we always made them try to find the ride home from practice. That's emotional abuse. I had postpartum and couldn't be with my daughter for the first 12 weeks of her life, which made her feel invisible. And these are very real things, which we've talked about as a family, but it makes me scared like, oh shit, what if they marry? So I want to make sure that we leave with people feeling empowered. We are going to link to absolutely everything from your books to your workshop, to anything that you have about how you write an amen's letter so that people have a template. I would love to know if this is happening to you, what is the first couple steps that you want people to take immediately after listening to this?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:04:10):
I think, I'm not trying to sell my book, but I think get my book or attend some of my webinars just because it's a really complex thing and every story is a little bit different. But I think as an action step, I think the most powerful things to write are really good immense letter. And those also aren't really easy to do because they're kind of counterintuitive and getting to write them in a way that doesn't sound defensive or overly explanatory or et cetera. I think that's the single most important thing you can do. Stop defending, stop explaining. Assume your child has very good reasons even if you don't understand them, even if you feel like they're rewriting history to really approach them with a perspective of love and learning and respect for their boundaries or that they get to set the terms of the relationship. I think those are really the most important principles. And I think if people catch these dynamics early enough on, they're in a much better position than if it's gone on for a number of years, which is typically by the time parents reach me, it's been a number of years. So they often just have a bigger hole to dig themselves out of because they've already made all the mistakes that we all make when we're going through this.
Mel Robbins (01:05:16):
If you are in a situation where you are sensing that the boyfriend or girlfriend or new husband or spouse is starting to pull your child away from you, what should you do now to stop that sort of distancing that can happen?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:05:35):
Well, you have to see that that person is the gatekeeper to your child and to your potential or current grandchildren. So you can't say anything that's going to threaten them. And some people are married to really troubled people. So the more troubled your son-in-law or daughter-in-law is the more you have to kind of walk on eggshells. You can't demand anything from them. You don't want to say anything critical about them to your child because in all likelihood, it'll be passed on to that. Once that happens, you're kind of screwed. So if you have done that as many people have, then you want to work your tail off to repair that and make amends to that son-in-law or daughter-in-law, but they're the gatekeeper. They're the new alpha. Once your kid marries you are going to be diminished in the eyes of your child. You are in some ways being replaced. So it's not, parents aren't wrong to feel like they're being replaced because in some ways they are, but it's developmentally appropriate. But the more parents complain about it and don't accept that transition, the worse it is.
Mel Robbins (01:06:39):
In all the years that you've been counseling people on topics of estrangement, what is the hopeful message here?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:06:50):
And the hopeful message is that statistically more, most people do have a reconciliation. It may not happen right away, but the majority of estrangements do eventually reconcile, and that's not based on even people doing my method. So I would guess that if they're doing my methods, that the statistics would be better just given my own practice and personal experience with it. So I think that's helpful.
Mel Robbins (01:07:19):
Why do you think that is? Why do you think we have a natural default toward wanting to reconcile even if we're the ones that cut somebody out?
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:07:31):
I mean, I think as people mature and grow, they're probably able to see their parents with more clarity. They may become parents themselves and either be able to face what that would be like, or they want their children to have a relationship with their grandparents. I think that even though the notion of family being forever is still is a more diluted concept than it once was, I think it's still part of our culture. So I think people do feel some kind of a tendency in that direction, which may motivate them more towards pursuing that. So,
Mel Robbins (01:08:04):
And one final question, Dr. Coleman. We started this by talking about this really interesting shift in culture that has led to this silent epidemic of estrangement where people are moving from the role to feeling like you're an individual. There is less emphasis on family and more on kind of your chosen family and your friends being the family that you choose. And I just want to know if you could tell us what you wish people were thinking instead, if this is the way that culture is going, as somebody who has been practicing and has been a therapist and an expert in this area, and you've seen the breakdown of relationships and the reconciliation of relationships, what do you wish you would see in our culture? And just kind of as a chance to say, there are millions of people that listen to this podcast, so I would love for you to just be able to drop a bomb on how people are thinking about this in terms of their parents and their own trauma and their own history and the importance of empathy on both sides.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:09:24):
Yeah. I think that we're sorely lacking in empathy and compassion in this culture, and it's ruining us as a society. And so having compassion and forgiveness, it doesn't mean you're giving somebody a pass who's been hurtful to you, but it does enable you to feel things in life or as a person or to have an identity that in some ways can feel more grounding. Sometimes people who are estranging have kind of a more victimized identity, will you hurt me? So I don't owe you anything, and I've been victimized by you, so I'm cutting you off, and that makes me a stronger person. Well, I don't really know that it does. I mean, it may provide a certain kind of insulation against certain kinds of experiences, but I think as a society, we have to do a much better job. I think parents have to do a better job in taking responsibility and showing compassion and empathy, and I think adult children have to do a better job and showing compassion and empathy for their parents. So I think both of those qualities on both sides are still, there's a lot more to do.
Mel Robbins (01:10:29):
Dr. Coleman, thank you so much for your work. Thank you so much for your wisdom. Thank you so much for your time today. It's been a real honor spending time and learning from you.
Dr. Joshua Coleman (01:10:40):
Likewise. It was good to talk to you.
Mel Robbins (01:10:41):
Thank you. Oh, well, I'm glad we ended with hope, and I feel very hopeful knowing that more often than not, your attempt to reconcile works if you give it time. Please share this with anybody in your life, whether they're the ones that cut somebody off or whether they're the person that got cut off because it was packed with tools and insight and wisdom that we all need to hear. And speaking of what we all need to hear, I want to make sure that you hear me tell you that I love you, I believe in you, and I'm not going anywhere. I'm here Mondays and Thursdays. There is no estrangement between you and me. I'm going to hold your hand. I am going to put my arm around you. I'm going to do whatever I can to understand and to support you, because that's what I want to do. Alrighty, I'll talk to you in a few days. Okay, so lemme think about this. Well, hold on a second. I don't think I want to start there. Let's see. Lemme think. Why don't we just close this down and just kind of talk to, lemme start over. Oh my God, sorry. Okay, here we go.
(01:12:01):
These kids are yelling out there. Can't you see that a recording light is on? I'm going to a strange, these friends of my sons from myself, that's not a thing that could happen. Okay, here we go. Ha. Okay. Is that the cat or my, okay. He does not want to listen to the topic of estrangement, but you do. Okay, excellent. Oh, and one more thing, and no, this is not a blooper. This is the legal language. You know what the lawyers write and what I need to read to you. This podcast is presented solely for educational and entertainment purposes. I'm just your friend. I am not a licensed therapist, and this podcast is not intended as a substitute for the advice of a physician, professional coach, psychotherapist, or other qualified professional. Got it. Good. I'll see you in the next episode. Hey, it's Mel. Thank you so much for being here. If you enjoyed that video, bye. God, please subscribe because I don't want you to miss a thing. Thank you so much for being here. We've got so much amazing stuff coming. Thank you so much for sending this stuff to your friends and your family. I love you. We create these videos for you, so make sure you subscribe.
Dr Coleman’s training course for healthcare professionals (psychologists, social workers, marriage and family counselors) who are working with estranged parents or estranged adult children: https://www.drjoshuacoleman.com/rulesofestrangementtraining